 |
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction Human Veterinary Environmental Industrial Agricultural MSG
Introduction Descriptions Synonyms Image Bank Lecture Bank Video Bank
Introduction Susceptibility MIC Database Procedures Histopathology
Introduction Abbreviations Links CME Conference Highlights Bibliography Glossary Good Books Events Calendar
Introduction Our Mission Editorial Board Editorial Staff Supporters Contributors Legal Stuff Privacy Policy Kudos
Introduction Descriptions Synonyms Image Bank Lecture Bank Video Bank
This page updated:
1/27/2007 9:23:00 AM
DoctorFungus - All Rights Reserved
© 2007 Copyright
& Privacy Policy
Site built and designed for doctorfungus by Webillustrated
|
 |
 |
 |
|
You are here:
Drugs >
Medical
>
|
Antifungal Dosage Adjustment in Kidney and Liver Dysfunction
Like many other medications, dosages of antifungal agents may be adjusted in patients with compromised kidney or liver function to minimize potential toxicities associated with drug accumulation. Drug interactions can also require a change in antifungal dosing. Fortunately, the effects of impaired kidney and liver function on antifungal concentrations in the body can be anticipated based on the pharmacokinetic properties of the specific antifungal agent; i.e. its absorption, distribution, and pathway for elimination from the body. In certain situations, measuring the serum drug concentration of an antifungal agent can provide some guidance for dosage adjustment or in the assessment of potential for toxic effects.
Although renal function can be assessed by a number of tests and procedures, creatinine clearance (an indicator of the glomerular filtration rate or GFR) is typically considered to be the guiding factor for dosage adjustment. Typically, fixed adjustments in the dose or duration are made for antifungals predominantly cleared through the kidney (i.e. fluconazole, flucytosine) as the GFR rate declines. However, these ranges encompass up to a tenfold range in renal function and may not be optimal for all patients. Therefore, antifungal dosing should always be individualized on the basis of kidney and liver function, medical status of the patient, and severity of the infection.
In patients with chronic renal failure who are receiving intermittent dialysis, the degree of drug removal is dependent upon the type of dialysis (peritoneal versus hemodialysis), the dialysis prescription (e.g., dialysis membrane composition, filter surface area, dialysate composition and flow rate) and the physiochemical characteristics of the drug (e.g., molecular weight, membrane permeability or water solubility, etc.). A more detailed description of factors that effect the dialysis of drugs can be found here. Critically-ill patients with renal failure generally require continuous dialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which can be provided by a number of methods (e.g., continuous atriovenous hemofiltration, CAVH; continuous venovenous hemofiltration, CVVH; continuous atriovenous hemodialysis, CAVD; continuous venovenous hemodialysis, CVVD; continuous atriovenous hemofiltration, CAVHDF; slow continuous ultrafiltration, SCUF; continuous venovenous high-flux hemodialysis, CVVHFD). Because of the multiple techniques employed in CRRT and variability in individual patient circumstances, clinicians should always refer to the primary literature for assistance with the dosing of specific antifungals. General guidance for adjustment of antifungal dosages in the setting of renal dysfunction is summarized below.
| Drug |
Dose normal renal function |
GFR > 50 |
GFR 10-50 |
GFR < 10 |
Hemodialysis |
CAPD |
CRRT |
| Amphotericin B |
0.25-1.5 mg/kg q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
q24-q36h |
None |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
Dose for GFR 10-50 |
| ABLC |
5 mg/kg q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
q24-q36h |
None |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
Dose for GFR 10-50 |
| ABCD |
3-5 mg/kg/day |
q24h |
q24h |
q24-q36h |
None |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
Dose for GFR 10-50 |
| L-AMB |
3-5 mg/kg q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
q24-q36h |
None |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
Dose for GFR 10-50 |
| Flucytosine |
37.5 mg/kg q6h |
q6h |
q12h-24h |
q24-q48h |
Dose after dialysis |
0.5-1 g/d |
Dose for GFR 10-50 |
| Ketoconazole |
200-400 mg q24h |
100% dose or interval |
100% dose or interval |
100% dose or interval |
Full dose or interval |
100% dose or interval |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
| Fluconazole |
100-800 mg q24h |
100% dose or interval |
50% dose or interval |
50% dose or interval |
100% after dialysis |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
| Itraconazole |
200-400 mg q12h |
100% dose or interval |
100% dose or interval |
IV not recommended* |
100% dose or interval
IV not recommended* |
100% dose/interval |
Dose for GFR 10-50 |
| Voriconazole |
6 mg/kg IV x 2 doses then 4 mg/kg q12h or 200 mg PO q12h |
100% dose or interval |
100% dose or interval
IV not recommended* |
IV not recommended* |
100% dose or interval |
100% dose or interval |
Dose for GFR 10-50 |
| Posaconazole |
600-800 mg day in divided doses |
q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
100% dose or interval |
| Caspofungin |
70 mg initial dose, then 50 mg daily |
q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
100% dose or interval |
| Micafungin |
50-150 m daily |
q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
100% dose or interval |
| Anidulafungin |
100-200 mg initial dose, then 50-100 mg daily |
q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
q24h |
Dose for GFR < 10 |
100% dose or interval |
* Due to accumulation of the cyclodextran vehicle, which is minimally dialyzable
Source: 2004 Dialysis of Drugs and The Renal Drug Book.
A number of antifungals require biotransformation into more water-soluble metabolites by the liver before excretion from the body. Antifungals are also known to have, like many other drugs, potentially toxic effects in the liver that may be enhanced with pre-existing liver disease. Therefore, antifungal therapy must be used in caution in patients with hepatic insufficiency. In terms of drug dosing, patients with moderate to severe hepatic dysfunction often exhibit a decreased capacity to metabolize certain antifungal agents, leading to decreased overall drug clearance, an increase in the plasma/serum area under the concentration curve (AUC), and prolongation of the half-life (t1/2) of the drug. Hepatic dysfunction can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antifungal agents by 1) Reducing the activity of drug metabolizing enzymes such as the cytochrome P450 system, 2) reducing the synthesis of plasma proteins to which the antifungals bind in the bloodstream, and 3) decreasing hepatic blood flow, which results in a decreased efficiency of the liver to clear drugs [1941].
Unfortunately, the severity of hepatic dysfunction and its consequent effects on drug therapy are much more difficult to quantify than renal dysfunction and no single test or calculation has been shown to satisfactorily measure hepatic function and its impairment. This is probably due to the wide spectrum of causes and clinical sequalae of liver dysfunction (e.g., cirrhosis, acute vs. chronic hepatitis, drug-induced liver disease). The most common severity index of hepatic dysfunction reported in the medical literature is the Child-Pugh Score, which is determined from well described clinical indicators of hepatic function such as protein and coagulation status, and the presence and severity of ascites and/or encephalopathy. Based on the fundamental understanding of drug pharmacokinetics, general recommendations for dosage adjustment of antifungals in patients with hepatic dysfunction can be summarized below:
| Drug |
Effect of hepatic impairment |
Adjustment |
Dosing Recommendations |
| Amphotericin B |
Not characterized |
No dosage adjustment currently recommended |
Prescribing information |
| ABLC |
Not characterized |
No dosage adjustment currently recommended |
Prescribing information |
| ABCD |
Not characterized |
No dosage adjustment currently recommended |
Prescribing information |
| L-AMB |
Increased deposition of L-AMB in the lung [1018] |
No dosage adjustment currently recommended |
Prescribing information |
| Flucytosine |
No change in serum concentrations in cirrhotic patients[261] |
No dosage adjustment required |
Prescribing information |
| Ketoconazole |
Poorly described, possible changes in drug distribution[317] |
Consider 50% reduction in dosage in severe hepatic impairment |
Prescribing information |
| Fluconazole |
Decreased clearance, increased AUC and t1/2[1986] |
Consider 50% reduction in dosage in mild to moderate hepatic impairment. Use only if benefits outweighs risk in patients with severe hepatic impairment |
Prescribing information |
| Itraconazole |
Decreased clearance, increased AUC and t1/2 |
Consider 50% reduction in dosage in mild to moderate hepatic impairment. Use only if benefits outweighs risk in patients with severe hepatic impairment |
Prescribing information |
| Voriconazole |
Decreased clearance, increased AUC and t1/2 |
Mild to moderate hepatic dysfunction- following standard loading dose, reduce maintenance dosage by 50%. Use only if benefits outweighs risk in patients with severe hepatic impairment. |
Prescribing information |
| Posaconazole |
Decreased clearance, increased AUC and t1/2 |
Use only if benefits outweighs risk in patients with severe hepatic impairment. |
Prescribing information |
| Caspofungin |
Decreased clearance, increased AUC |
Mild hepatic insufficiency: No dosage adjustment needed. Moderate hepatic dysfunction-reduce maintenance dose to 35 mg/day. Not studied in severe hepatic dysfunction. |
Prescribing information |
| Micafungin |
No significant change in pharmacokinetics |
No dosage adjustment recommended |
Prescribing information |
| Anidulafungin |
No significant change in pharmacokinetics |
No dosage adjustment recommended |
Prescribing information |
* Mild hepatic insufficiency- Child-Pugh Class A; Moderate hepatic insufficiency- Child Pugh Class B.
|
|

References
261. Block, E. R. 1973. Effect of hepatic insufficiency on 5-fluorocytosine concentrations in serum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 3:141-2.
317. Brass, C., J. N. Galgiani, T. F. Blaschke, R. Defelice, R. A. O'Reilly, and D. A. Stevens. 1982. Disposition of ketoconazole, an oral antifungal, in humans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 21:151-8.
1018. Heinemann, V., D. Bosse, U. Jehn, A. Debus, K. Wachholz, H. Forst, and W. Wilmanns. 1997. Enhanced pulmonary accumulation of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in acute liver transplant failure. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:295-297.
1941. Rodighiero, V. 1999. Effects of liver disease on pharmacokinetics. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet. 37:399-431.
1986. Ruhnke, M., R. A. Yeates, G. Pfaff, E. Sarnow, A. Hartmann, and M. Trautmann. 1995. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 35:641-7.
|
|
|
 |
 |
Home |
Image Bank |
Lecture Bank |
Knowledgebase |
Site Map |
Contact Us |
The Fungi |
Mycoses |
Drugs |
Laboratory |
Education & Tools |
About Us
|
|
|
|