 |
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction Human Veterinary Environmental Industrial Agricultural MSG
Introduction Descriptions Synonyms Image Bank Lecture Bank Video Bank
Introduction Susceptibility MIC Database Procedures Histopathology
Introduction Abbreviations Links CME Conference Highlights Bibliography Glossary Good Books Events Calendar
Introduction Our Mission Editorial Board Editorial Staff Supporters Contributors Legal Stuff Privacy Policy Kudos
Introduction Descriptions Synonyms Image Bank Lecture Bank Video Bank
This page updated:
1/27/2007 9:23:00 AM
DoctorFungus - All Rights Reserved
© 2007 Copyright
& Privacy Policy
Site built and designed for doctorfungus by Webillustrated
|
 |
 |
 |
|
You are here:
Drugs >
Medical
>
|
|
Liposomal Amphotericin B (L-AMB)
Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) is a lipid formulation of amphotericin B. As with the other lipid formulations, the major goal of developing L-AMB has been to attain a compound with lower toxicity and with at least similar efficacy compared to the parent compound, amphotericin B deoxycholate.
L-AMB is composed of amphotericin B complexed with hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine, distearoylphosphatidylglycerol, and cholesterol. Unlike the other lipid formulations of amphotericin B, it is a true liposome composed of unilamellar lipid vesicles [14, 1044]. L-AMB is being manufactured by Nexstar Pharmaceuticals (San Dimas, CA, USA). Its trade name is Ambisome™.
Compared to the other lipid formulations of amphotericin B, L-AMB reaches higher concentrations in plasma and remains in the circulation longer. Similar to the other lipid formulations, L-AMB concentrates in reticuloendothelial system. However, its uptake to the reticuloendothelial system cells is slower. This feature is presumably due to the smaller size, higher transition (melting) temperature and more rigid bilayer of the liposome. This finally provides a persistent pool of L-AMB in plasma and a sustained delivery to the site of infection [13, 1309, 1848, 2176]. L-AMB attains high concentrations in brain tissue [907].
Elimination of L-AMB from serum is biphasic. This pattern suggests that L-AMB is first concentrated in reticuloendothelial system cells and then is redistributed. [2356].

The mechanism of action and intrinsic antifungal activity of L-AMB is the same as the parent compound, amphotericin B [2232].
The significance of susceptibility testing for L-AMB, as for that of any of the lipid formulations of amphotericin B, is not known. This is mainly due to the fact that the enhanced activity of lipid formulations of amphotericin B follows from the lesser toxicity of the lipid preparation. This permits administration of increased doses of amphotericin B and, presumably, increased delivery of active drug to sites of infection.
Comparative in vitro results have been reported. However, these results are inconsistent. Some investigators have observed similar in vitro activity for L-AMB and amphotericin B deoxycholate [65]. Others have reported higher L-AMB MICs against TO Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate and other lipid amphotericin B formulations [1129, 1705]. For Aspergillus spp., ranking of the in vitro activity of amphotericin B and its lipid formulations has been reported as amphotericin B deoxycholate = ABCD > L-AMB > ABLC [1668]. The relevance and meaning of these in vitro data remain yet unknown. In the interim, we believe that testing should simply be done with amphotericin B, the parent compound.
For susceptibility patterns of amphotericin B, amphotericin B. For L-AMB MICs obtained for various types of fungi, see susceptibility patterns and the susceptibility database.
Optimal dose for L-AMB is not known. It is in general used at doses of 1-5 mg/kg [1044]. It has been reported that 1 mg/kg/day dosing is as effective as 4 mg/kg/day in treatment of invasive aspergillosis [666]. However, in this study, the number of patients with proven fungal infection is higher in the group receiving high-dose. Thus, the efficacy of high dose might have been low due to the existence of more definitive and serious infection. High dose application is still preferred by many authorities.
Similar to the other lipid formulations, nephrotoxicity due to L-AMB is less frequent compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate [1542, 2372]. Other side effects are usually mild. Infusion related side effects [2372] and anaphylactic reactions [1284, 2245] have rarely been reported. Reversible hepatic dysfunction and hypernatremia have been observed [1542].
L-AMB is administered intravenously.
L-AMB is used as a salvage agent when amphotericin B therapy fails or is unacceptably toxic. It is not a first-line drug for any of the fungal infections. It is also licensed as an empirical therapeutic agent in febrile neutropenia are [1844, 2357, 2372]. Its potency in different clinical settings is under continuing investigation. Among the lipid amphotericin B formulations, L-AMB is one of the more commonly used preparations.
|
|

References
13. Adler-Moore, J. P., and R. T. Proffitt. 1998. AmBisome: Long circulating liposomal formulation of amphotericin B, p. 185-206. In M. C. Woodle and G. Storm (ed.), Long circulating liposomes: Old drugs, new therapeutics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
14. Adler-Moore, J. P., and R. T. Proffitt. 1993. Development, characterization, efficacy and mode of action of AmBisome, a unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B. Journal of Liposome Research. 3:429-50.
65. Anaissie, E., V. Paetznick, R. Proffitt, M. J. Adler, and G. P. Bodey. 1991. Comparison of the in vitro antifungal activity of free and liposome-encapsulated amphotericin B. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10:665-668.
666. Ellis, M., D. Spence, B. de Pauw, F. Meunier, A. Marinus, L. Collette, R. Sylvester, J. Meis, M. Boogaerts, D. Selleslag, V. Kremery, W. von Sinner, P. MacDonald, C. Doyen, and B. Vandercam. 1998. An EORTC international multicenter randomized trial (EORTC number 19923) comparing two dosages of liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:1406-1412.
907. Groll, A., N. Giri, C. Gonzalez, T. Sein, J. Bacher, S. Piscitelli, and T. Walsh. 1997. Penetration of lipid formulations of amphotericin B into cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue. 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Abstract No.
1044. Hiemenz, J. W., and T. J. Walsh. 1996. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: Recent progress and future directions. Clin. Infect. Dis. 22:S133-S144.
1129. Johnson, E. M., J. O. Ojwang, A. Szekely, T. L. Wallace, and D. W. Warnock. 1998. Comparison of in vitro antifungal activities of free and liposome-encapsulated nystatin with those of four amphotericin B formulations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1412-1416.
1284. Laing, R. B. S., L. J. R. Milne, C. L. S. Leen, G. P. Malcom, and A. J. Steers. 1994. Anaphylactic reactions to liposomal amphotericin (letter). Lancet. 344:682.
1309. Lee, J. W., M. A. Amantea, P. A. Francis, E. E. Navarro, J. Bacher, P. A. Pizzo, and T. J. Walsh. 1994. Pharmacokinetics and safety of a unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) in rabbits. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:713-8.
1542. Mills, W., R. Chopra, D. C. Linch, and A. H. Goldstone. 1994. Liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of fungal infections in neutropenic patients: a single-center experience of 133 episodes in 116 patients. Br. J. Haematol. 86:754-760.
1668. Oakley, K. L., C. B. Moore, and D. W. Denning. 1999. Comparison of in vitro activity of liposomal nystatin against Aspergillus species with those of nystatin, amphotericin B (AB) deoxycholate, AB colloidal dispersion, liposomal AB, AB lipid complex, and itraconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1264-1266.
1705. Pahls, S., and A. Schaffner. 1994. Comparison of the activity of free and liposomal amphotericin B in vitro and in a model of systemic and localized murine candiasis. J. Infect. Dis. 169:1057-1061.
1844. Prentice, H. G., I. M. Hann, R. Herbrecht, M. Aoun, S. Kvaloy, D. Catovsky, C. R. Pinkerton, S. A. Schey, F. Jacobs, A. Oakhill, R. F. Stevens, P. J. Darbyshire, and B. E. S. Givson. 1997. A randomized comparison of liposomal versus conventional amphotericin B for the treatment of pyrexia of unknown origin in neutropenic patients. Br. J. Haematol. 98:711-718.
1848. Proffitt, R. T., A. Satorius, S. M. Chiang, L. Sullivan, and J. P. Adler-Moore. 1991. Pharmacology and toxicology of a liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) in rodents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 28 (Suppl. B):49-61.
2176. Storm, G., and M. C. Woodle. 1998. Long circulating liposome therapeutics: From concept to clinical reality, p. 3-16. In M. C. Woodle and G. Storm (ed.), Long circulating liposomes: Old drugs, new therapeutics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
2232. Terrell, C. L., and C. E. Hughes. 1992. Antifungal agents used for deep-seated mycotic infections. Mayo Clin Proc. 67:69-91.
2245. Torre, I., J. Lopez-Herce, and P. Vazquez. 1996. Anaphylactic reaction to liposomal amphotericin B in children (letter). The Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 30:1037-1038.
2356. Walsh, T. J., I. Bekersky, and V. Yeldandi. 1995. Pharmacokinetics of AmBisome in persistently febrile neutropenic patients receiving empirical antifungal therapy. 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Abstract No.
2357. Walsh, T. J., R. W. Finberg, C. Arndt, J. Hiemenz, C. Schwartz, D. Bodensteiner, P. Pappas, N. Seibel, R. N. Greenberg, S. Dummer, M. Schuster, and J. S. Holcenberg. 1999. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 340:764-771.
2372. Walsh, T. J., V. Yeldandi, M. McEvoy, C. Gonzalez, S. Chanock, A. Freifeld, N. I. Seibel, P. O. Whitcomb, P. Jarosinski, G. Boswell, I. Bekersky, A. Alak, D. Buell, J. Barret, and W. Wilson. 1998. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a small unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) in neutropenic patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2391-2398.
|
|
|
 |
 |
Home |
Image Bank |
Lecture Bank |
Knowledgebase |
Site Map |
Contact Us |
The Fungi |
Mycoses |
Drugs |
Laboratory |
Education & Tools |
About Us
|
|
|
|